Common Hazards in the Workplace Guide

A hazard is something with the potential to cause harm. Harm means physical or mental damage or injury, as well as reduced quality of life and performance. Hazards in the workplace are potentially everywhere, and they most certainly should not be ignored or taken lightly.

Some industries naturally carry more risks but hazards can occur in workplaces of all types. As part of managing the health and safety of your business, you must control the risks in your workplace. To do this you need to think about what might cause harm to people and decide whether you are taking reasonable steps to prevent that harm.

The guide takes you through the main hazards found in the workplace and control measures to manage them.

How is harm gauged?

Harm can be gauged in the following ways:

  • How much? (Quantity)
  • How often? (Frequency)
  • How long? (Duration)
  • How susceptible is a person to the type of harm? (Condition)

The harm arising from a great many common hazards can be understood in these terms.

One way of classifying hazards is to group them by the general category of harm they cause, such as:

  • Mechanical
  • Physical
  • Chemical
  • Biological
  • Environmental
  • Organisational

Mechanical hazards

A mechanical hazard is any hazard involving a machine or process. Mechanical hazards are created by the powered operation of apparatus or tools, which may be machine-generated or human.

Mechanical hazards can be categorised according to the type of injury caused:

  • Crushing – when part of the body is caught between a moving part of a machine and a fixed object.
  • Shearing – when part of the body is subjected to a scissor action from equipment.
  • Cutting and severing – when part of the body comes into contact with a saw or knife.
  • Entanglement – when clothing or hair comes into contact with rotating objects or catches.
  • Drawing-in or trapping – when part of the body is caught between two counter-rotating parts.
  • Impact – when a moving object strikes part of the body.
  • Stabbing and puncture – when flying or ejected objects penetrate the body.

Physical hazards

Physical hazards are those substances or conditions that may harm a person’s physical safety. A physical hazard is a naturally-occurring process that has the potential to cause injury, illness and death, including:

  • Tripping;
  • Slipping;
  • Falling from a height or on a level; and/or
  • Being struck by a falling object.

Physical hazards are usually overlooked because of familiarity, or a resistance to spend time and money on improvements. However, slips and trips are the most common cause of major injuries at work.

Physical hazards also include ergonomic hazards – a physical factor within the environment that harms the musculoskeletal system. Working conditions or body positions often put strain on the body when a worker’s capacity for work is restricted by the type of work. Ergonomic hazards include repetitive movement, manual handling, workplace / job / task design, uncomfortable workstation height and poor body positioning.

Fire is included amongst physical hazards, as is noise, pressure and vibration.

Chemical hazards

Chemicals are considered a hazard due to their intrinsic properties to cause harm to humans, property or the environment. Chemical hazards can be presented by substances that are:

  • Used directly in work activities (for example, adhesives, paints, cleaning materials).
  • Generated during work activities (for example, fumes from soldering and welding).

Chemicals can harm a person’s health when entering the body by absorption through the skin, ingestion through the mouth, and inhalation through the lungs.

Most people associate chemicals with certain professions and workplaces such as laboratories; however, chemicals are found in many common workplace products. While these chemicals have a variety of beneficial uses, they can also be extremely harmful if they are misused.

Biological hazards

Biological hazards are organic substances or microorganisms that pose a threat to the health of humans and other living organisms. Biological hazards also include toxins that are produced by organisms.

Biological hazards pose risks for many workers in a variety of ways. People working with microorganisms (such as in laboratories) are at a high risk of exposure, but other examples of work activities that may bring people into contact with biological hazards include:

  • Working with animals – for example, farming.
  • Working with people who might be infectious – for example, healthcare professionals.
  • Handling waste materials – for example, refuse disposal.
  • Working in an environment or with equipment that could be contaminated – for example, sewer maintenance.

Environmental hazards

Environmental hazards have the potential to affect the environment and adversely impact people’s health. These hazards come in various forms and are often unnoticed until an accident occurs. Environmental hazards can include poor lighting, unreasonable temperatures and dust.

Understanding the various environmental hazards that exist and taking precautions can help prevent accidents. Balancing work activities and work rates with the right temperature, humidity, air movement, clothing, food and drink intake, body build and psychosocial factors is important for workers’ efficiency, comfort and safety.

Organisational hazards

Organisational hazards are associated with behaviour, workload, time constraints and deadlines. Studies have shown that the following have the potential to be stressful:

Temporal aspects of work – for example, shift work, overtime.
Work content – for example, nature of tasks and level of autonomy.
Interpersonal issues within a team – for example, interaction with co-workers, equality of workload.
Interpersonal issues with supervisors – for example, provision and receipt of feedback.
Organisational structures.

The ideal workload should be organised and balanced, to avoid fatigue on the one hand, and on the other, to ensure employees are engaged and being productive.

Conclusion

When classifying hazards like this there is potential for some ambiguity. For example, a toxin produced by a micro-organism that is present in inhalable dust could easily be classified in more than one category: there are environmental, biological and chemical components. Almost every hazard situation is going to have an organisational component.

However, the main benefit of the six categories is that it is hard to think of any hazard that does not fit into one of the categories. So, on examining a workplace to find several examples in each category of hazard, it will result in a very thorough risk assessment.

Then the hierarchy of Control measures can be implemented

“Eliminate” “Reduce” “Prevent”

Tesco and WRAP ramp up global advocacy programme on food loss and waste

Tesco is set to take its advocacy for other businesses to tackle food loss and waste to the global stage, ahead of the COP30 climate summit in November.

Tesco has, reported the redistribution of 300,000 meals through partners including Fareshare (pictured). Food waste is a climate issue because it is estimated to contribute to at least 8% of annual global emissions – more than aviation.

WRAP (The Waste & Resources Action Programme) is notably advocating for national governments to include tangible plans to measure and reduce food loss and waste as part of their contributions to the Paris Agreement. Of the 195 countries that attended the last UN climate summit, only 12 had taken this step.

In the UK, as is the case in many developed nations, the majority of food waste occurs within homes (60%). However, there are still ample further opportunities to reduce the amount of surplus and food loss at the farm level, and to increase efficiencies and redistribution in retail and manufacturing.

Future-fit food systems

WRAP highlighted that reframing food waste through the lens of food security will be necessary in the months ahead, with the need to reset the global food system as the population grows and the climate changes.

One-third of what we produce goes to waste every year while millions go hungry. We need a fair and sustainable system to protect these fragile networks from future disruptions and to make the most of the food we have, for all.

Food security will become a priority for governments as the real impacts of climate change bite harder in the coming years, and tackling waste is a key step they must take. WRAP and Tesco are taking a stand to call out inaction, and demand more from those who fail to act.

Tesco was one of the first retailers globally to report on food waste on a voluntary basis. It also led the way in asking suppliers to adopt the Target-Measure-Act approach to food waste reduction.

The company was a founding member of the UK Food and Drink Pact, managed by WRAP. This Pact was founded to help businesses align their food waste targets and strategies with the UN’s global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

The UK Government still has not mandated food waste disclosures for large businesses despite the advocacy and leadership of some supermarkets, like Tesco, plus widespread support for the change, first promised in 2018.

WRAP is aiming for 50 new businesses to join its food pacts and agreements as part of a new expansion target. It is focusing on businesses in the UK, Brazil, the EU, Indonesia, Mexico, Australia and South Africa.

London To End Congestion Charge Exemption For Electric Vehicles

Transport for London (TfL) is pressing ahead with plans to stop exempting electric vehicles (EVs) from the capital’s Congestion Charging schemes from January 2026. Instead, a discount will apply from an increased standard price.

                          London to end congestion charge exemption for electric vehicles

Launched in 2003, the congestion charge was the first scheme requiring drivers in Central London to pay a daily charge. As the name implies, it exists to incentivise a reduction in traffic by nudging motorists towards public transport, walking and cycling.

The charge is currently £15 per day, per vehicle – a rate that has applied to individual motorists and to fleet vehicles alike since 2020.

TfL is proposing to increase the charge to £18 per day, per vehicle, from 2 January 2026. The aim is to switch even more journeys to public transport and active transport.

Discounts for Electric Vehicles

TfL has also provided clarity on the future of congestion charging discounts for EVs. At present, they benefit from a 100% discount, which is expiring at the end of 2025. Mindful of the ongoing electrification of London’s vehicle stock, changes to the scheme are needed to meaningfully address congestion.

From 2 January 2026, TfL is proposing, electric cars registered for Auto Pay will benefit from a 25% discount, to £13.50. Meanwhile, electric vans, electric heavy goods vehicles (HGVs) and electric quadricycles registered for Auto Pay will receive a 50% discount to £9.

TfL estimates that these changes will result in 2,200 fewer vehicles on Central London’s roads on an average weekday, compared to a scenario in which the scheme remains as it is.

The discount schemes are intended to benefit fleet managers and individual drivers completing trips which are the most challenging to shift to public transport.

TfL is also consulting in further reductions to EV-related congestion charging discounts from 2030. It is proposing that, from this point, electric cars registered for Auto Pay will only get a 12.5% discount. The discount for electric vans, electric HGVs and electric quadricycles will decrease to 25% at this point.

Residents’ Discount

Those living within the congestion charge zone benefit from a 90% discount, provided that they have registered their vehicles.

TfL is proposing that eligible new applicants, from 1 March 2027, only receive the discount for EVs.

HSBC weakens 2030 emissions targets

HSBC will no longer strive to achieve net-zero emissions across its operations and supply chains by 2030. The bank has blamed the slow pace of decarbonisation globally for scaling back its climate ambitions.

The business first set the 2030 emissions target in 2020 and opted for a 2019 baseline.

Announcing its annual results this week, HSBC noted “good” progress on decarbonising its own operations but said that change was “proving slower” across the supply chain. It pointed the finger at factors outside of its control.

“As a bank, our ability to finance our customers’ transition and, in turn, progress toward and meet our targets, relies on decarbonisation solutions scaling across sectors, alongside growing demand from our customers for capital to transition their business models,”

HSBC’s annual report states.

“We are limited by, and cannot on our own overcome, the present lag in policy measures and the overall slower pace of the transition… These factors put our customers’, and our own, net-zero ambitions at risk.”

With this in mind, HSBC said it would need to rely on carbon offsetting to a significantly greater extent than anticipated to meet its original 2030 target.

HSBC is therefore delaying its net-zero emissions target for operations, travel and supply chains to 2050. For 2030, it will strive for a 40% reduction against a 2019 baseline.

HSBC will also review its targets for reducing financed emissions – those generated by the businesses and projects which it financially supports. It has sector-specific 2030 emissions targets for financed emissions in oil and gas; power and utilities; cement; iron, steel and aluminium; aviation; automotive and thermal coal mining.

It is disappointing to see that HSBC has chosen to further weaken its climate target. If it cannot even strive to reduce emissions from its own operations and supply chain, there is little hope that it will trigger meaningful change through its investments.

“HSBC claims the transition is moving too slowly, yet it forgets that its own financial services are locking the world into fossil fuel dependence, exacerbating climate change.”

Extreme weather and biodiversity loss still seen as biggest risks over next decade

Extreme weather events and ecosystem collapse have, for the second year running, been confirmed as the risks which experts across the world are most concerned about over the next ten years.

The 2025 edition of the Global Risks Report from the Word Economic Forum (WEF).

Drawing on surveys of more than 900 risk experts, policymakers and industry leaders, the report provides a snapshot of the risks perceived to be the most likely and most severe over a two-year and ten-year horizon.

The top two risks for the next two years remain the same year-on-year, with misinformation and disinformation taking the top spot and extreme weather events in at second. Indeed, Christian Aid recently estimated that extreme weather events resulted in at least $200bn of costs and damages in 2024.

Storm damage in St Petersburg, Florida, in autumn 2024.

More than half of the respondents expect instability over the next two years.

And for a ten-year horizon, extreme weather continues to be classed as the top risk. Moreover, as was the case last year, experts believe a range of interlinked and cascading environmental risks will crystallise within a decade.

The top ten list for the next ten years includes biodiversity loss and ecosystem collapse, natural resource shortages, critical change to Earth systems (i.e. climate tipping points) and pollution.

Yet the WEF found that many large businesses are not prioritising environmental risk management in their strategies. When businesses were asked which challenges they expect the highest benefits from addressing in terms of resilience, nothing related to climate and nature was in the top ten.

Corporations are far more likely to be preparing to address talent and labour shortages. Most are concerned about supply chain disruptions and more than one-quarter are preparing for disruptions to critical infrastructure, which can be caused by climate risks, but are not using environmental framing.

UK Fears Over-Burdening Airlines With Offsetting and Carbon Pricing Costs

The UK Government has set out measures to prevent airlines from both paying for carbon offsetting under a new mandatory international scheme, and paying carbon pricing under the UK’s Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS).

The Government has this week published its response to the advisory body’s most recent annual progress report to Parliament on the delivery of net-zero by 2050 – the nation’s long-term, legally binding climate commitment.

Airport expansion

Nonetheless, the Government’s official response to the CCC’s report shows that it is not prepared to take all of its recommendations on board.

The CCC urged the government to halt all airport expansion projects until a UK-wide passenger capacity management framework is in place to assess the aviation sector’s climate impact. Its report stated: “There should be no net airport expansion unless the carbon intensity of aviation is outperforming the Government’s emissions reduction pathway and can accommodate the additional demand”.

The Government has stated that it “recognises a role for airport expansion where it provides economic growth and is compatible with our legally binding net-zero target and strict environmental standards”. No pause will be implemented.

Shortly after the election, the green economy by approving expansion plans for London City Airport that will increase passenger capacity by up to 40%.

Expansion plans are also in the works for airports including Bristol, Heathrow, Gatwick and Luton.

Why Manufacturing Companies Should Adopt an ISO 9001 Quality Management System

ISO 9001 helps companies ensure that their processes are efficient, consistent, and meet customer requirements. It involves implementing standardised procedures and controls to monitor and improve the quality of products throughout the production cycle.

Manufacturing companies should adopt an ISO 9001 Quality Management System (QMS) for a variety of reasons. ISO 9001 is not only a recognised standard in the United Kingdom but is also an internationally recognised system for quality management, and its adoption can provide numerous benefits to a manufacturing company, such as improved quality, increased efficiency, and enhanced customer satisfaction. Combining these benefits usually leads to access to more markets and hence sales of a company’s products and/or services.

Improved Quality of Products and Services

ISO 9001 helps manufacturing companies to improve the quality of their products and services. The standard requires organisations to establish and maintain a documented quality management system that defines their quality objectives, policies, and procedures. This helps to ensure that all aspects of the manufacturing process are documented, controlled, and consistently executed, leading to a more reliable and consistent product or service. By adopting ISO 9001, manufacturing companies can also identify and address quality issues more effectively, leading to a reduction in defects, scrap, and rework. This, in turn, can help to reduce costs and improve profitability.

Increased Efficiency and Productivity

ISO 9001 can help manufacturing companies to increase efficiency and productivity. The standard requires organisations to continually monitor and improve their processes, which can help to identify and eliminate inefficiencies, bottlenecks, and waste. By streamlining processes, reducing waste, and increasing efficiency, manufacturing companies can reduce lead times, improve on-time delivery, and increase throughput. This can help to reduce costs, improve profitability, and increase competitiveness.

Enhanced Customer Satisfaction

ISO 9001 can help manufacturing companies to enhance customer satisfaction. The standard requires organisations to establish and maintain a system for monitoring customer feedback, which can help to identify areas for improvement and ensure that customer needs and expectations are met. By consistently meeting customer requirements, manufacturing companies can increase customer satisfaction and loyalty, leading to increased sales and revenue.

Effective Risk Management

ISO 9001 can help manufacturing companies to manage risk more effectively. The standard requires organisations to identify and assess risks and opportunities, and develop plans to address them. By identifying and mitigating risks, manufacturing companies can reduce the likelihood of quality issues and non-compliance with regulations, leading to a more robust and resilient organisation.

Improved Decision Making

ISO 9001 promotes improved decision within manufacturing organisations by fostering a data-driven approach, enhancing the understanding of processes, managing risks within the processes, conducting root cause analysis, prioritising customer needs, driving continual improvement, providing clear documentation, involving employees, and utilising performance metrics. These elements collectively create a structured environment that enables informed, proactive, and quality-focused decisions, leading to enhanced efficiency, customer satisfaction, and overall organisational success.

Employee Engagement and Empowerment

ISO 9001, a quality management standard, can significantly impact employee engagement and empowerment within an organisation. As ISO 9001 requires organisations to define and communicate roles and responsibilities, this clarity helps employees understand their specific contributions, increasing their sense of purpose and engagement.

The concept of process ownership, where employees are accountable for managing specific processes empowers individuals to make decisions, take initiative, and drive process improvements, fostering a sense of empowerment and engagement.

ISO 9001 encourages organisations to establish mechanisms for employee suggestions and feedback on process improvements. Engaging employees in the improvement process not only empowers them but also shows that their input is valued, enhancing their motivation and engagement.

The standard also emphasises identifying competency requirements and providing necessary training. By investing in employee development, organisations enhance their skills and capabilities, empowering them to contribute effectively and grow within the organisation.

Finally, ISO 9001 promotes effective communication at all levels of the organisation. Regular communication channels and involving employees in decision-making processes create a sense of belonging, value, and empowerment, leading to increased engagement.

Benefits When Bidding for Contracts

As ISO 9001 is an internationally recognised standard for quality management systems by having the certification, you demonstrate your commitment to meeting customer requirements and delivering quality products or services. This enhances your credibility and reputation, making you a more attractive choice for potential clients.

Many organisations and government agencies require or prefer suppliers with ISO 9001 certification, as it assures them of your ability to consistently deliver high-quality results.

The ISO 9001 certification provides a framework for implementing a robust quality management system (QMS). This system ensures that your business has effective processes in place to monitor and improve quality throughout all stages of project execution. This gives clients confidence that you have the necessary controls in place to meet their quality expectations.

Some industries and markets require ISO 9001 certification as a prerequisite for participation. By obtaining the certification, you can expand your business opportunities and gain access to these markets. This can open up new avenues for growth and increase your chances of winning lucrative contracts.

The ISO standard also has emphasis customer focus and satisfaction. By implementing customer feedback mechanisms, addressing customer complaints, and continuously improving your processes, you can build stronger relationships with your clients. Satisfied customers are more likely to recommend you to others and provide positive references during the bidding process.

Summary

Overall, adopting an ISO 9001 Quality Management System can provide numerous benefits to manufacturing companies. By improving quality, increasing efficiency, enhancing customer satisfaction, managing risk, making better-informed decisions, and increasing employee engagement, manufacturing companies can become more competitive, reduce costs, and increase profitability.

In addition, adopting ISO 9001 can help manufacturing companies to demonstrate their commitment to quality and their ability to consistently meet customer requirements. This can help to build trust and confidence with customers, suppliers, and other stakeholders, leading to increased business opportunities and partnerships. By adopting ISO 9001, manufacturing companies can also stay abreast of the latest trends and best practices in quality management, and continue to evolve and improve their processes over time.

Find days between 2 dates

Industrial Companies Directory – UK Industrial & Commercial Suppliers